Minutes:
The Chair
welcomed and thanked Gavin Bown from Natural
Resources Wales (NRW) for attending and for his readiness to speak with Committee
Members regarding this issue of concern. The Chair explained the original
meeting had been arranged for January with representatives from NRW and Dwr Cymru Welsh Water (DCWW)
invited, but unfortunately, NRW had been unable to attend.
Gavin Bown apologised for his inability to attend the meeting
arranged in January. Gavin Bown provided a
presentation to the Committee outlining the following:
·
Background
·
SAC
rivers in Wales
·
Standards
·
Structure
of new targets
·
An
overview of the SAC rivers in Wales (includes maps) with a focus on the River Teifi
·
Implications
·
NRW
Response
·
Nutrient
Management Boards (including Teifi Nutrient
Management Board)
·
External
Groups
·
Next
Steps- Wales-wide & Teifi
Committee Members
then had the opportunity to question Gavin Bown. The
main points/concerns raised were:
·
In response to whether NRW were satisfied they had complied with
the Well-being and Future Generations Act 5 ways working with the original
release, Gavin Bown noted that generally, NRW were
attempting to learn from every element of the process, which includes putting a
framework in place to ensure any discussion and consultation were held
accordingly in moving forward.
·
Significant Mine Water Projects are being delivered at present
across Wales by NRW to improve water quality. Gavin Bown
to provide a written update regarding Rheidol Valley to the Committee Members.
·
In response to whether NRW had gone out to consultants for
potential mitigations work despite data from Wye and other Local Authority’s
(LA’s) commissioning similar evidence, it was noted that one of the key reasons
NRW had pushed for an Oversight Group was to avoid duplication of efforts and
to ensure the public had value for money.
·
Carmarthenshire’s nutrient calculator has been developed
specifically for the River Towy but work will be done as part of the Oversight
Group to look at other calculators and to develop a calculator suitable for all
rivers. Consideration is needed in terms of how NRW will manage the output of
calculators.
·
NRW will be involved in the Oversight Group along with each
Nutrient Management Board (NMB) to ensure there is a joined-up approach, but it
is important to understand that all rivers have different needs and that
solutions will vary.
·
In response to a question around water quality, Gavin Bown clarified the revised standards varied between rivers
to factor in the natural background, but generally, it was around 50-80%
tighter than the previous standards.
·
NRW has prevented the LA from further development on the River Teifi (which affects 40% of Ceredigion), due to SAC
following conducting a compliance assessment which the planning department must
follow, yet, during the planning consultation process where NRW are statutory
consultees, they respond with no objections to applications of development of
new dwellings on the River Teifi. Concerns raised as
this gives the public the impression that the planning department/ Elected
Members are preventing development rather than NRW and therefore transparency
is required. Gavin Bown suggested for examples to be
sent to him to look into.
·
Alan Davies explained there were around 40 applications not yet
given consent purely due to issues relating to the phosphate pathway and the
department was continually apologising to the public due to NRW’s lack of
response. Gavin Bown confirmed the amended Phosphorus
Guidance was currently being worked on and the work was taking a little longer
than anticipated to ensure the advice was correct and of assistance to local
authorities. Once finalised, it will be shared immediately with planning
departments.
·
NRW’s objective is to lower the levels of phosphates to ensure
there would be no restrictions on the work that needed to be carried out. Gavin
Bown was aware the meeting with DCWW had possibly
been more focused on sewage and therefore he had not included much on this in
his presentation.
·
Committee Members felt the agriculture sector was given the
blame as it has been suggested that over 80% of phosphorus is as a result of
agriculture. There was uncertainty whether agriculture departments (including
IBERS at Aberystwyth University) had been contacted given their knowledge and
expertise; Gavin Bown noted he would look into
this.
·
Consideration was currently given to whether a national
agricultural sub-group should be formed. If so, agricultural departments along
with farming unions (e.g FUW & NFU) would be
invited to attend. Cllr Rhodri Evans (Chair of Ceredigion NMB) clarified
representation from the agricultural sector would be invited to Ceredigion’s
NMB meeting. Gavin Bown noted he would check whether
farming unions were involved in the Oversight Group.
·
In terms of NMBs, Gavin Bown was not
aware of any financial support from NRW nor from WG for the development of
management plans or for someone to overlook the boards similar to Natural
England. Due to concerns that nothing will progress otherwise, Gavin Bown will escalate this and Cllr Rhodri Evans as Chair is
asked to raise this with other Chairs of the NMBs. NMBs are encouraged to work
collaboratively and to link in with the Oversight Group where
possible.
·
Following a member’s input, Gavin Bown
stated he was unaware of Norfolk’s experience with phosphates but there had
been discussions with other agencies from England and so he would raise this
along with the information around large European companies who specialise in
tanks to collect phosphates.
·
Hirwan and Dulais rivers are a part of
the Fisheries Habitat Improvements Project. Further information will be sent
around the work by Gavin Bowen.
·
Concerns were raised with the manner the interim planning advice
was released in January 2021 as there was no grace period. Businesses and
organisations plan ahead yet NRW failed to take this into account. In addition,
the NMBs & Phosphate Guidance should have been in place before the
changes.
·
It was strongly felt by the Committee Members that rural areas
such as Ceredigion were not treated fairly and questions were raised why the
Marine SAC had not been yet been released; Gavin Bown
clarified he was unaware of any political or any other reasons why this data
had been delayed.
·
Once the Marine SACs will be published, 90% of Ceredigion could
be faced with no development until mitigation factors were in place. Nothing
was in place as things stood. Gavin Bown noted that
any learning from the River SACs work would be put in place in the future to
find solutions to problems such as with the Marine SACs.
·
DCWW officers had assured that a small quantity of phosphates
was released from the Waste Water Treatment Plant (WWTP). Significant
investment is needed in installing stripping plants at the WWTP but this work
had not been incorporated into DCWW plans of yet which is a worry.
·
Strong concerns were raised that the SAC Rivers imposed by NRW
has brought Ceredigion to a halt in terms of developments, yet they were not
taking ownership of the issue. Committee Members felt this was having a
detrimental impact on the local economy including on employment and on the
population’s decision to live and work in the area, particularly young people
and families. It was strongly felt that NRW and WG needed to provide a clear
directive of the way forward, and for a solution to the issue.
·
Gavin Bown explained that he clearly
understood the importance of the matter to the Committee Members and in
ensuring the work progressed promptly but it was key for everyone to work
together to find a solution and this was the approach they were trying to take,
on a national and catchment level. He explained that he would discuss the
matters raised at today’s meeting accordingly.
The Chairman, on behalf of
Committee Members, thanked Gavin Bown from NRW for
attending and for his valued contribution at the meeting.
It was suggested and agreed by
Committee Members that the Chairman writes to the Chairman of Natural Resources
Wales and the Welsh Government expressing the concerns raised at today’s
meeting.
Supporting documents: