Venue: Hybrid - Neuadd Cyngor Ceredigion, Penmorfa, Aberaeron / remotely via video conference
No. | Item |
---|---|
Apologies Minutes: i.
Councillors Ceris Jones (Vice-Chair), Mark
Strong, Ifan Davies and apologised for their inability to attend the meeting. ii.
Donna Pritchard, Corporate Lead Officer, Porth
Gofal and Sian Howys, Corporate Lead Officer, Porth Cynnal apologised for their
inability to attend the meeting. |
|
Disclosures of personal interest (including whipping declarations) Members are reminded of their personal responsibility to declare any personal and prejudicial interest in respect of matters contained in this agenda in accordance with the provisions of the Local Government Act 2000, the Council's Constitution and the Members Code of Conduct. In addition, Members must declare any prohibited party whip which the Member has been given in relation to the meeting as per the Local Government (Wales) Measure 2011. Minutes: Councillor Wyn Evans declared a personal interest under item 5. |
|
Independent Reviewing Service Performance Management Report qtr 3 2021 2022 Minutes: Councillor Alun Williams (Cabinet Member for Through Age and
Wellbeing) presented the Independent Reviewing Service Report Quarter 3
2021/2022. Quarterly reports are taken to the Healthier Communities Overview
and Scrutiny Committee as part of an ongoing examination of the topic to ensure
that the Local Authority fulfils its duties as the Corporate Parent. The report
includes national and local standards and targets used to measure outcomes for
looked after children (LAC) and care leavers at the time of their review
meeting and includes Welsh Government Performance Indicators. On the basis of the information available
and the views expressed during the review meeting, the IRO makes a professional
judgement about the effectiveness of a child/young person’s care plan in
meeting their needs and may recommend changes to the care plan. During the
review meeting, the IRO considers whether the child/young person requires
assistance to identify relevant other people to obtain legal advice/take
proceedings on their behalf. This action was not deemed necessary by the IRO
for any child in the period. In addition, the IRO has regard as to whether the child/young
person’s human rights are being breached in any way and, if so, might make a referral
to CAFCASS Cymru. This action was not required at any of the review meetings in
the period. These reports are considered within Multi Agency LAC Quality
Assurance Meetings which meet quarterly; these meetings provide an opportunity
to identify and act upon performance and other issues with this area of work.
The reports are also circulated and reviewed by Local Authority’s Corporate
Parenting Group, which takes place quarterly. Councillor Alun Williams
proceeded to present a Summary of the Key Points noted on page 2 of the report. Elizabeth Upcott noted they had not received any indication on
how the new guidance on the changes to routine dental appointments would affect
the service. Health professionals attend quality assurance monitoring meetings. Councillor Alun Williams expressed disappointment with the
announcement as the Council’s key strategy with the Though-age and Wellbeing
Model was to provide early intervention and prevention, which should reduce the
need for more expensive services further on. The Chair highlighted that there had been a significant increase
in the number of LAC over the past 2 years, as reflected on page 4 of the
report. She commended the service for a clear and well-presented report.
Elizabeth Upcott explained that a similar trend has been seen nationally following the pandemic, and although the number of children in care in Ceredigion was low compared to other local authorities, there was a concern and preventions were being put in place for the short and long term. Reference was made to the Nature of the Placement Provision of Children Reviewed and the Legal Status of Children reviewed in the Quarter. Pathway planning was explained to the committee members. It was highlighted that the local authority continued to have a legal responsibility to provide care and support to care leavers who are between 16-25 years old. Despite not all ... view the full minutes text for item 3. |
|
Housing Support Programme 2022 2026 Minutes: Llyr Hughes presented the background to the Housing Support
Programme 2022-2026 as outlined in the report. The 4 background papers required
under the current grant guidance were referred to, and it was noted that the
4-year plan identified 4 strategic priorities and also
actions in moving forward. He clarified that the plan encompassed all housing
needs, and it was underpinned by the overarching strategy. In response to a query surrounding the new regulations for
renting that will come into force on 1 December 2022, Llyr Hughes explained
that landlords were leaving the market and others were increasing rent and
bonds for the most vulnerable. There was a lot of anecdotal information
circulating, but it was generally the picture across Wales. In terms of ‘no fault’ evictions, Housing Options Service
had a gateway service, and they were able to signpost people to the correct
support. The Council are a part of Leasing Scheme Wales and aims to work
closely with private landlords. Members have seen an increase in enquiries from people who
have received notices to leave private rented accommodation due to various
reasons. Not only does this affect people’s mental health but it reduces the
availability of rental accommodation. Ceredigion’s Housing Options Service were
commended for its support. Members were reminded to direct residents to the Housing
Options Service if in need of support with finding alternative accommodation.
He appreciated there was a lack of affordable housing and that the housing
allowances did not reflect private market rents. Following questions by the Committee Members, it was agreed
to recommend the Housing Support Programme and a Statement of Needs for Cabinet
approval. |
|
Minutes: Heddwyn Evans
referred to the background and the current situation outlined in the report. It
was noted that the proposed fees were in response to the increase in people
selling pets privately and online rather than purchasing from a pet shop. A
reference to the Current Situation was provided, which included that an
introduction to the legislation was presented through the Democratic process in
November 2021 and also Lucy’s Law, which was already
in place in England. The proposed fees listed on page 2 of the report reflects
the additional work the authority has to undertake and
the level of input from officers. Reference was made
to What is in and out of the scope: Selling Animals as Pets including the
Business Test, In scope criteria, Guideline indicators
of running a business of selling animals as pets, Out of scope criteria and
Guideline indicators of “out of scope” activities as outlined in the
report. Members were
provided with the opportunity to ask questions which were answered by Heddwyn
Evans. The main points raised were as follows:
·
Heddwyn
Evans explained that they monitor online advertisements and the frequency of
advertisements by unlicensed breeders, which may indicate that breeding was
done as a commercial activity. ·
There
are difficulties with traceability in terms of monitoring the welfare of dogs
once they had ended breeding as there is no legislation to support this.
Protection is in place for licensed breeders that do not allow more than one
litter a year and 6 in a lifetime. In addition, there is a retirement strategy
in place and microchipping was a legal requirement. Work is continually being
done to protect the welfare of animals. ·
In terms
of who was categorized as a breeder, Heddwyn Evans clarified that authorities
were looking at various scenarios to ensure there was consistency. Monitoring
over a course of time is key to see if the activity is commercial and to make a
profit. Each case will be considered on its own merit before a decision is
done. ·
Following
concerns raised by members that families may have a litter a year for
additional income, Heddwyn Evans clarified there were no intentions to licence
people in this position but rather, people who had litters from multiple dogs
in a year. ·
HMRC
Badges indicate that a £1000 profit may suggest a commercial activity- Heddwyn
Evans highlighted that this would raise concerns given the increase in prices
recently. ·
Monitoring
websites, identifying breeders and patterns of operation is time-consuming. The
added enforcement has been included in the fee. If additional resources will be
required to undertake the work, consideration will need to be given to this. ·
Concerns
were raised by members that the difference in the definition of domestic or
commercial activity was a grey area. ·
Members
felt that having a family pet was important, to educate children on how to care
for pets. · Alun Williams, CLO, reassured members that the aim was to target unlicensed people who were clearly operating as dealers of pets and are ... view the full minutes text for item 5. |
|
Minutes of the previous meeting Minutes: It was AGREED to confirm the minutes of the meeting held on
15 March 2022. Matters arising: None. |
|
Draft Forward Work Plan 2022-2023 Minutes: It was AGREED to note the Forward Work Programme presented
subject to the following: i.
A workshop specifically for the budget of the
services under the committee’s remit (Autumn) ii.
The Chair encouraged committee members to inform
her of any issues they wished to explore as part of the committee’s remit. The Chair thanked all for their patience at today’s meeting
and apologised for the technical difficulties. |