Venue: Hybrid - Neuadd Cyngor Ceredigion, Penmorfa, Aberaeron / remotely via video conference
Contact: Lisa Evans
No. | Item |
---|---|
Apologies Minutes: i.
Councillor
Clive Davies, Cabinet Member for Economy and Regeneration apologised for his
inability to attend the meeting due to other Council commitments. ii.
Councillor
Carl Worrall apologised for having to leave the meeting early. |
|
Disclosures of personal interest (including whipping declarations) Minutes: i.
Councillor Keith Henson declared a personal
interest under item 5. ii.
Councillor Meirion Davies declared a personal
interest under item 7. iii.
Councillor Gwyn Wigley Evans declared a personal
interest under item 4. iv. Rhodri Llwyd, Corporate Lead Officer declared a personal interest under item 4, in accordance with the Code of Conduct for Local Government Employees. |
|
Chair Announcements Minutes: i.
The Chair extended his best wishes to Lisa
Evans, Standards and Scrutiny Officer on her role in the Legal Service and
thanked her for her support on behalf of the Committee. ii. The Chair extended his thanks to Councillor Keith Henson for his dedication and work as a Cabinet Member since being elected in May 2022. Councillor Shelley Childs was wished well as he took on the role of Cabinet Member from April 2025 onwards. This was echoed by others in attendance. |
|
Ceredigion Highways Asset Management Plan (HAMP) 2025-2030 Additional documents: Minutes: Councillor Keith Henson (Cabinet Member for Highways and
Environmental Services and Carbon Management) presented an update on the
high-level strategic direction for the Highways Asset Management Plan 2025-2030
(HAMP). The report set out a 5-year plan on how Ceredigion County Council would
manage and maintain the highway asset. It would replace the HAMP 2020-25
approved by Cabinet on 9 June 2020. The report formed the strategy behind how
Highways Services would discharge its Local Highway Authority duties within the
resources (human and fiscal) available. An overview of the background as
outlined in the report was provided. Councillor Keith Henson explained that the HAMP document
presented to the Committee had been reviewed in line with current best
practice, resource availability and need. The operational contents of the HAMP
and recommended investment in the highway asset was intended to fulfil the
statutory duties placed on the Council by the Highways Act 1980 acting as the
Local Highway Authority whilst meeting the goals of the Corporate Strategy.
During the life of the HAMP, the Highways Service would provide an Asset Status
and Options Report (ASOR) annually to show the condition of the highway asset
and how the investment was performing against the baseline set by this HAMP.
The ASORs would recommend options each year on the investment required to meet
the performance criteria set out in the HAMP. It was intended that the ASORS
would be available to Members prior to the budget-setting process for the
following financial year. In addition, the key performance indicators presented
in the ASORS would be benchmarked nationally through the County Surveyors
Society Wales and reported to the Welsh Government (WG) as part of the State of
Nation Asset report. Phil Jones, Corporate Manager provided an overview of the
HAMP document. He explained that to an extent, the HAMP was a baseline policy
document that sat in the background. He noted that the current budget was
insufficient for the work that was required to be carried out. Members were provided with the opportunity to ask questions
which were answered by Officers and Councillor Keith Henson. The main points
raised were as follows: •
An additional £4.6m of Local Government
Borrowing Initiative (LGBI) funding had been allocated by WG, on the condition
the current spend on highway maintenance remained the same. 60% of the funding
would be received this year, with the remaining 40% the following year.
Officers explained that they would rather receive additional funding on an
annual basis, rather than a sum of money every so often. Planned maintenance
provided better value for money than reactive maintenance. Once the funding and
the list of works were confirmed, further details would be shared with Members.
• Concerns were raised with the networks’ drainage systems. Some Members felt investment was needed in this area sooner than 2030 as was currently the case. Officers noted that weather conditions and runoff from adjacent private land impacted on the condition of roads and that they were limited to the extent of the ... view the full minutes text for item 4. |
|
Update on Phosphates workstreams Additional documents: Minutes: Dr Sarah Groves-Phillips, Corporate Manager presented an
update on the phosphate risk register, which had since been downgraded to a
service risk and a general update on the ongoing work. In January 2021, Natural
Resources Wales (NRW) released advice to planning authorities on permitting
development in riverine catchments of Special Areas of Conservation (SAC)
across Wales. This guidance effectively placed an embargo on most development
within the river Teifi SAC catchment which encompassed over 50% of Ceredigion
and 3 of the 6 main towns. Ceredigion County Council added this constraint to
its corporate risk register shortly after and was forced to hold in abeyance a
number of planning applications and put the Local Development Plan preparation
on formal pause. An overview of the information shared at the Committee in
October 2024 was provided along with an update on the work in the past few
months as outlined in the report. Nutrient Management had been on the Corporate Risk Register
for some time and whilst the work of the service in monitoring, delivering
improvements, leading by example had been comprehensive and had allowed some
capacity for development across the Teifi catchment alongside partner work by
Dŵr Cymru Welsh Water (DCWW) and NRW. This development opportunity was
still constrained and remained a critical challenge to economic growth. The
potential release of Marine SAC guidance was a real risk to the economic growth
of the county outside the Teifi catchment. Thus, it was important to continue
to include the Nutrient risk on the register and maintain momentum and critical
action on the project objectives. With that in mind, the risk register would be
reviewed regularly and actions updated as projects moved forward. An overview
of the current identified mitigating actions as outlined in the report was
provided. Members were provided with the opportunity to ask questions
which were answered by Dr Sarah Groves-Phillips. The main points raised were as
follows: ·
It was not possible to directly compare
Ceredigion’s data on the river Teifi to NRW’s data, as the method of testing
was different. Citizens Science had been commissioned to undertake work, and
the results would be available soon. NRW had access to Ceredigion's data and
vice-versa, but it was not likely that NRW would use Ceredigion's data in their
analysis. ·
In response to a query related to whether there
was a notable difference in the levels of phosphate in the river Teifi
following the restrictions imposed on the agricultural sector in the past year,
it was noted that it was too early to say, and it would possibly take up to 7
years to come to a conclusion, however, the situation would be monitored. It
was acknowledged that the main source of phosphates was due to the wastewater
treatment plants. · The Nutrient Management Board (NMB) had not undertaken modelling work on how the river Teifi would look in a decade, however DCWW had done some work. Without a legislative framework in place, it was difficult to ensure actions were carried out. A ... view the full minutes text for item 5. |
|
Delivery of Economic Strategy Additional documents: Minutes: Arwyn Davies, Corporate Manager provided an update on the
progress of the delivery of the Economic Strategy for Ceredigion County Council
for 2020-2035. He explained that Ceredigion County Council had long championed
the development and growth of its local economy as a key corporate ambition.
This had been shown through continual prioritisation throughout successive
political administrations with Boosting the Economy, Supporting Businesses and
Enabling Employment remaining its first corporate priority. An overview of the vision and key priorities (People, Place,
Enterprise, and Connectivity) as outlined in the report was provided. The
strategy aimed to leverage Ceredigion’s strengths and address challenges to
foster a thriving, inclusive economy. There continued to be a challenge in the
economy and there was a particular focus on areas where there remained
significant challenges. Arwyn Davies provided a presentation to the Committee
outlining the following: ·
Population, Employment, Qualifications &
Earnings ·
Key Challenge ·
Business Births/ Deaths in Ceredigion ·
Active enterprises in Ceredigion ·
Businesses 5-year Survival ·
Tourism in Ceredigion ·
Tourism Performance 2012 vs 2023 ·
UK Shared Prosperity Funding (2022-2025) / Arfor
– Enterprising Communities (2022-2025) / Transforming Towns (2022-2025) ·
Economic Strategy (People, Place, Enterprise,
Connectivity) ·
Considerations Members were provided with the opportunity to ask questions
which were answered by Arwyn Davies. The main points raised were as follows: ·
Concerns were raised that the economy continued
to recover from the Covid-19 pandemic. In terms of the impact of the Arfor and
SPF programmes, it would be possible to assess and monitor the impact on a
micro and macro level. There were many positives from both programmes and it
was key to learn and build for the future. ·
In relation to the SPF programme, 2025/26 was a
transition year and there were ongoing discussions between the UK Government
and WG on the future of the programme from 2026 onwards. ·
Members congratulated all involved with the
success of Arfor and the opportunities it had presented to so many people
across Ceredigion. It was noted that Arfor in its current form would come to an
end at the end of March 2025, and no confirmation had been received to date on
its future. ·
Strategic harbour investment was a part of the
Growing Mid Wales growth deal and had received support from the Board at the
Strategic Outline Business Case stage. Due to factors outside the local
authority’s control, the private business partner no longer operated.
Discussions and a review of the proposals continued, with a view to re-submit
the plans in the next 4-5 months. ·
Although 275 out of a target of 300 new
businesses had been created, it was important to set an aim and continue with
the ambition of having more businesses start than end. In addition, the number
of businesses that employed 50+ members of staff in Ceredigion compared to the
level nationally was very low, therefore there was an aspiration to improve
this. · Due to the level of detail involved with the agenda item, it was suggested that the Committee had a separate meeting to discuss and focus on ... view the full minutes text for item 6. |
|
Oversight of in year financial matters Additional documents:
Minutes: Duncan Hall,
Corporate Lead Officer provided an overview of the 24/25 Controllable Revenue
Budget - Financial Performance - Quarter 3 presented to the Cabinet on 11.03.25.
At the time of writing the report, a projected underspend was forecast for the
year of £97k on the Controllable Budget i.e. a balanced position was now
expected to be achieved for the 24/25 financial year. An overview of the
following as outlined in the report was provided: · Budget Performance - Headline In Year
Challenges · Budget Performance - Key Benefits · Budget Performance - Budget Savings · Budget Performance – Council Tax (including
Premiums) Members were
provided with the opportunity to ask questions which were answered by Duncan
Hall. The main points raised were as follows: · In relation to the reduction of empty homes,
it was noted that this was due to several factors, such as properties being
categorised as exempt due to work carried out or being advertised for sale or
rent. · It was noted that the threshold for
non-domestic rates for self-catering properties in Wales was set in legislation
by WG. · Committee Members were urged to contact the
Overview and Scrutiny Officer or the Chair if there were any specific service
areas they wished to request further information on such as budgetary pressures
not covered in the quarterly financial reports presented to the Committee. · Matters related to the recruitment and
retention of staff in social care would be presented at the Overview and
Scrutiny Co-ordinating Committee on 27.03.25. · In relation to the additional £4.6m of LGBI
funding allocated to highways services by WG, it would increase the capital
budget but would be time-limited for 2 years and cost-neutral for the Council. It was AGREED to
note the report and for the Committee to scrutinise the information provided as
it deems appropriate and relevant to the areas under its remit. |
|
Minutes: It was AGREED to confirm the minutes of the meeting held on
7 February 2025. Matters arising: None. |
|
To consider the Overview and Scrutiny Forward Work Programme Additional documents: Minutes: It was AGREED to note the contents of the Forward Work
Programme presented subject to the following: · Further details on the Economic Strategy |